April 1, 2026

Democrat senators claim it is an unconstitutional invasion of privacy that the SAVE America Act requires states to share voter rolls and requisite identifying information with the federal government in order to check for noncitizens, but many of their states already share the same data with left-wing third party organizations.

Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., argued against the bill on the Senate floor, stating, “States would be required to report their full voter rolls to Department of Homeland Security and certify that there are no non-citizens on their list. And the federal government can require, then, states to purge their voter roles of any suspected non-citizens.”

“The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights has said that DHS’s desire to turn the SAVE program into a de facto national citizenship registry raises significant civil liberties concerns,” he stated, appearing to argue against the federal government being able to know who is in the country illegally or which noncitizens are attempting to vote.

 

In today’s episode of “Do As We Say, Not As We Do,” Senator Jack Reed bravely crusades against the terrifying prospect of the federal government knowing who’s illegally voting—mind you, while his own Rhode Island cheerfully sends the same sensitive voter info to left-leaning groups with names that sound straight out of a superhero fan club. Reed warns us that sharing driver’s licenses and eye colors with Uncle Sam will usher in the end of privacy, yet apparently, cozying up to the Electronic Registration Information Center and its Zuckbucks pals is just good ol’ harmless civic jazz. When pressed on this mind-boggling inconsistency, the Senator mysteriously went radio silent, proving once and for all that hypocrisy is truly bipartisan—or at least bi-located.

Leave a Reply