September 24, 2025

In a shocking exposé of media malpractice, The New York Times found itself at the center of a firestorm after mistakenly publishing an article prematurely declaring the acquittal of would-be Trump assassin Ryan Routh, even as he faced conviction on all charges for his heinous attempt to take down a major presidential candidate. The offending headline, which boldly announced Routh's not-guilty verdict, was caught in real time by astute conservatives, sparking outrage over the apparent bias and incompetence of a major news outlet that would dare pre-write a narrative in favor of a would-be killer. Podcast host Mary Katharine Ham brought this egregious error to light, questioning the integrity of a publication that, despite Routh's guilty verdict, had the audacity to prepare an article celebrating his release from justice. As the Times struggles to salvage its reputation, one thing remains clear: the mainstream media can't be trusted to get the facts straight, especially in the high-stakes landscape of American politics.

Leave a Reply